The reality of apartheid evokes the reality of a world divided by borders between rich and poor, between wealth and squalor: Bureaucratic authoritarianism had been intrinsic to apartheid; people simply did not count as human beings, hence the squalid housing and inferior education for the majority. With rare candour he tells of the difficulties he has when preparing a judgment, of how every judgment is a lie. Instead of America's lusty, lively beer, he said South Africa's years of exploitation. As his term on the Court approaches its end, Sachs here conveys in intimate fashion what it has been like to be a judge in these unique circumstances, how his extraordinary life has influenced his approach to the cases before him, and his views on the nature of justice and its achievement through law. And I felt it would be possible to craft a very narrow exemption for the smoking of marijuana on occasions similar to the sacrament. With rare candour he tells of the difficulties he has when preparing a judgment, of how every judgment is a lie.
ورغم أن معظم الحضور لا يستطيعون سماعه بسبب تردد الصدى، فقد كان خطابا قاسيا لا يعجب الليدي تاتشر Thatcher Lady، كما تصرح فيما بعد. The question the narrative suggests is how can advanced democracies have so compromised themselves by falling under the sway of torture, when these powerless individuals, who faced the terrifying ideology, power and violence of the apartheid state, rejected it? Now I never had that kind of experience. And these are precisely the phrases and the sentences that have travelled the most, that have been picked up by the House of Lords in England, Canadian Supreme Court, elsewhere. As a result he was detained in solitary confinement, tortured by sleep deprivation and eventually blown up by a car bomb which cost him his right arm and the sight of an eye. After playing an important role in drafting South Africa's post-apartheid Constitution, he was appointed by Nelson Mandela to be a member of the country's first Constitutional Court. There they are with their brightly-coloured clothes and their dreadlocks, and they say, 'Why is everybody looking at us? For anyone interested in human rights work The Strange Alchemy of Law and Life deserves to be read.
By juxtaposing life experiences and extracts from judgments, Sachs enables the reader to see the complex and surprising ways in which legal culture transforms subjective experience into objectively reasoned decisions. Description: xiv, 306 pages ; 22 cm Contents: Tales of terrorism and torture -- Tock-tick : the working of a judicial mind -- A man called Henri : truth, reconciliation, and justice -- Reason and passion -- Laughing matters -- Reason and judgment -- The judge who cried : the judicial enforcement of socio-economic rights -- Human dignity and proportionality -- The secular and the sacred : the dual challenges of same-sex marriage -- The beginning and the end. And you're a lawyer, but you know what it's like to be defined as a criminal, defined as a terrorist, and you have experienced injustice at the hands of the state. As a result he was detained in solitary confinement, tortured by sleep deprivation and eventually blown up by a car bomb which cost him his right arm and the sight of an eye. You can work on a case for months and you read up your reports and articles from all over the world and you argue with your colleagues, and you've heard argument. Thank you Damian and Erica. It's part-autobiographical, part-history and yeah - okay - philosophical, but in a life-steeped way.
Description: 1 online resource 194 pages Contents: Cover Page -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Dedication -- Contents -- About the Author -- The Man Who Sang and the Woman Who Kept Silent -- Preface -- Acknowledgements -- Prologue -- 1. That is a lie, it tells a lie against the exciting and problematic and exhausting and exhilarating process of actually getting it into the stage where it is. Abbie Sachs examined cases not only by rationale, but also by his heart. And invariably, Sachs does not fail to elucidate the basic philosophical perspec A reading of Albie Sach's writings is never without a search for an understanding of South Africa's liberation struggle especially from the perspective of the African National Congress - currently the country's ruling party - perhaps with an underlying desire for ongoing interpretation and insight into its previous and current mindset with regards its aims and objectives for the future of South Africa and its people. I will be foisting it on colleagues and friends until they have all read it and been similarly inspired. As his term on the Court approaches its end, Sachs here conveys in intimate fashion what it has been like to be a judge in these unique circumstances, how his extraordinary life has influenced his approach to the cases before him, and his views on the nature of justice and its achievement through law.
The book serves as a judicial autobiography, combining personal narratives with sections of judgments authored by Sachs during his 15 years on the bench. Sachs is a doughty and courageous fighter in the struggle for justice in South Africa under the malevolent apartheid regime which made that country a world pariah. This book sheds an entertaining light into the workings of a fine judicial mind and is a useful reminder of the importance of what we do. Two judges were on leave then. Simple but not eas Instead of technicality rhetoric on laws and politics, Albie Sachs wrote about actual cases, which looked into the story of how judges were going to proceed the reconciliation process.
It was quite an emotional case. Rejecting purely formal notions of the judicial role he shows how both reason and passion concern for protecting human dignity are required for law to work in the service of justice. Mixing autobiography with reflections on his major cases and the role of law in achieving social justice, Sachs offers a rare glimpse into the workings of the judicial mind and a unique perspective on modern South African history. And he's a thoughtful and compassionate judge. With the startling lucidity which characterizes his writing, Sachs reveals what it was like to be a judge in circumstances which are particularly unique, especially in view of the fact that he was himself a victim of apartheid.
With first-hand accounts alongside academic interrogation, this unique book will intrigue anyone interested in the intersection of Law and Politics. We need to keep an open ear to these existential giants, to ensure our own open minds and hearts. By juxtaposing life experiences and extracts from judgments, Sachs enables the reader to see the complex and surprising ways in which legal culture transforms subjective experience into objectively reasoned decisions. On the court we had a number of people who had suffered harsh discrimination simply because they were black. Sachs played a major role drafting South Africa's new constitution following the end of apartheid, and was th For someone with absolutely no background in law me , Sachs seems to me to be an inspiring place to start. In fact, that is the idea and perhaps the procedure.
At our website you'll find some additional audio. And that dress is now hanging in our court, together with two other paintings that Judith did. Revisiting the decade from the perspective of the twenty-first century, Chris Megson provides an authoritative and stimulating reassessment of British playwriting in the 1970s. The event will be celebrated around the world. The book is written from the perspective of victory: the monster of apartheid has been slain.
An alternative ordering of human relationships is mandated by exclusive national citizenship. The E-mail message field is required. When the case comes to us, and the appropriate form of reasoning with the appropriate form of constitutional compassion, if you like, is found, then there is something that we can do, and the law became very, very meaningful. And I felt that disjuncture between the law we learned at university and we spoke about in our arguments in court, and the laws experienced by the majority of people. With rare candour he tells of the difficulties he has when preparing a judgment, of how every judgment is a lie. As an advocate at the Cape Bar from the age of 21, he defended people charged under racist statures and repressive security laws, incurring the wrath of the authorities.